|
Problems concerning the acceptance of Moshiach can be divided into the
following categories: Emotional, Theological, and Philosophical.
The
Emotional Problems:
The "emotional" fears are those which are usually couched in
intellectual terms, but are basically not different from any other
anxiety or fear, which is based on entirely irrational premises. The
intellectual formulations of these questions are mere rationalizations.
Very often the question is not a question, but an answer, an excuse for
one's own inadequacies. The question might be the guilty person's way of
assuaging his guilt at not having the same degree of faith as those whom
he is challenging.
As
one great Rabbi put it, "I can answer a question, but I cannot answer an
answer." As with other classical phobias and emotional problems people
have, the answer is to work hard at overcoming them, primarily by
recognizing them for what they are: irrational fears, which can and must
be overcome.
The
Theological Problems:
The
theological concerns about Moshiach in the minds of those who harbor
them are the pronouncements about Moshiach and his imminent arrival
which appear to contradict the values and beliefs of Judaism.
In
some instances, for example they are based on the questioners'
understanding of a passage in the Torah or Talmud. In other instances it
is a certain aspect of Moshiach which jars their religious
sensibilities.
These misgivings can be directed either against the very notion of
Moshiach, or the specific aspects of Moshiach which have been advanced
by the Rebbe in recent times. The challenges expressed frequently range
from the ones we hear from ill-informed Jews such as, "Isn't Moshiach a
non-Jewish belief?" to the quasi-sophisticated argument expressed by
so-called Torah scholars that the Talmud counsels against doing anything
to hasten the coming of Moshiach.
Some of the theological questions refer to the apparent inconsistencies
or contradictions concerning the nature of the belief in Moshiach. It
should also be noted that many of the questions have been expressed from
people who come from totally diverse backgrounds in terms of their
Jewish education and commitment.
The
Philosophical Problems:
The "philosophical" concerns are not rooted in religious doctrine, Torah
passages, or religious sensibilities, but in the individual's senses of
what is proper and what is not. Usually, there questions come from those
who do not know enough or do not care enough about authoritative
sources, and find it difficult to accept something that is at odds with
their philosophy of life and their general sensibilities.
Included in this category is the distaste for the restoration of the
monarchy and sacrifices as well as the danger some perceive in the
reliance on Moshiach to solve all of our problems.
It
is not a religious doctrine or Torah quotation which they cite and,
therefore, it is important to know that the response must be on what
will help make the concept of Moshiach, with all of its ramifications,
palatable to those who do not yet accept the Torah as the definitive
guide in determining what is right and what is wrong.
It
is not always easy to distinguish between a "theological" problem and a
"philosophical" one. Frequently, a question asked by one individual can
be of the former group, and the same question, posed by another of the
latter category.
The
difference lies in the questioner's set of values. In both instances the
question is based on gross misconceptions and ignorance. However, for
the one who attempts to answer the question, it is important that s/he
address the individual's primary concern. For the "theological"
questioner you must cite a source, chapter and verse; whereas for the
"philosophical" questioner, you must speak logic, or better yet, you
must reorient this individual by introducing him to the basics of Jewish
thought.
|